philosophy of art, the study of the nature of art, including concepts such as interpretation, representation and expression, and form. It is closely related to aesthetics, the philosophical study of beauty and taste.
What are the 4 philosophies of art? Art can be classified into four philosophies: emotionalism, expressionism, formalism, and imitationalism, especially reality. 'Emotionalism' and 'Expressionism' emphasize expressing emotions. In Formalism, there is no recognizable object, but there is emphasis on organization.
Instead, philosophy itself is art just as much as art is philosophy. Philosophy is the art of critical and analytical thinking, the art of reasoning, and the art of the illogical and logical. It is always an art.
Scientists, humanists, and art lovers alike value art not just for its beauty, but also for its social and epistemic importance; that is, for its communicative nature, its capacity to increase one's self-knowledge and encourage personal growth, and its ability to challenge our schemas and preconceptions.
4 Theories for Judging Art
Your response to your art stems from what you believe art is and what its overall purpose is. There are 4 main theories for judging whether a piece of art successful: Imitationalism, Formalism, Instrumentalism, and Emotionalism.
'The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance', Aristotle wrote. The theory of art as an imitation of beauty or nature was persistent throughout the history of art.
If we define “creative philosophy” as a systematic understanding and collection of beliefs around the nature of creativity, then it stands to reason that virtually every creative person, and certainly every ad agency, ought to have some form of codified creative philosophy written out somewhere, right?
Naturally, philosophy is distinguished from the other sciences by its being related far more closely to the aesthetic principle, to art. It synthesises the everyday experience of the people and something from the other sciences, and also something from art without confining itself to any of them.
Art is an expression made visible by a form. Art, at its root, is an expression and the artist is an expresser, translating in order to create meaning. Art is an expression, an expression of feeling, belief and character. Assumption is a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.
Like language, art is a form of expression. Its message may be symbolic or religious, historical or political. But the purpose of art is not simply to communicate a message, but more importantly, to elicit an emotional response, to 'move' us, in some way.
Art is generally understood as any activity or product done by people with a communicative or aesthetic purpose—something that expresses an idea, an emotion or, more generally, a world view. It is a component of culture, reflecting economic and social substrates in its design.
One of the things that has been alleged to be the purpose of art is its cognitive function: art as a means to the acquisition of truth. Art has even been called the avenue to the highest knowledge available to humans and to a kind of knowledge impossible of attainment by any other means.
One modern definition is “something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful.” Often, art is defined by its origin in the human mind. Imagination plays a key role in making any piece of art. Some people think of art as what happens when your creativity takes solid form.
The three aesthetic theories of art criticism are most commonly referred to as Imitationalism, Formalism, and Emotionalism.
ELEMENTS OF ART: The visual components of color, form, line, shape, space, texture, and value.
In a sense, all subsequent art criticism is an elaboration of these three philosophers' ideas, sometimes in combination: art can be seen as imitation, as psychological and moral, and as spiritual.
People classify a wide range of objects as art by general agreement. Every culture on earth has produced objects of visual interest, involving ornamentation, design, picture- making, and abstraction. Many of these objects serve no purpose except to feature such things, and we regard them as art.
The expression of “creation” amounts to creation from nothing and art is a work performed by bringing existing materials or thoughts together, that is to say by imitating them.
Art gives us meaning and helps us understand our world. Scientific studies have proven that art appreciation improves our quality of life and makes us feel good. When we create art, we elevate our mood, we improve our ability to problem solve, and open our minds to new ideas.
Art and philosophy are not the same. But the difference already passes through the concept of art and philosophy itself. Perhaps art and philosophy are connected by the fact that art generates a singular concept of art, and philosophy its own conception of philosophy.
Art is an expression of our thoughts, emotions, intuitions, and desires, but it is even more personal than that: it's about sharing the way we experience the world, which for many is an extension of personality. It is the communication of intimate concepts that cannot be faithfully portrayed by words alone.
Plato thus believed that representation needs to be controlled and monitored due to the possible dangers of fostering antisocial emotions or the imitation of evil. The object: The symbol being represented. Manner: The way the symbol is represented. Means: The material that is used to represent it.
Psychologists have generally held that creativity operates in much the same way in both domains (e.g. Weisberg, Creativity, ch. 1), and some philosophers have agreed, holding that both artistic and scientific creativity are a matter of problem solving (Briskman).
Correspondingly, the ability to think abstractly in some specific circumstances can lead to positive and unexpected results. In this way, the mind “plasticity” that results from a philosophical education can become an engine of creativity.
To name just few examples: Plato has Socrates say, in certain dialogues, that when poets produce truly great poetry, they do it not through knowl- edge or mastery, but rather by being divinely “inspired”—literally, breathed into— by the Muses, in a state of possession that exhibits a kind of madness.